Monday 23 March 2009

The Death of “Sweet Sixteen”

Posted to Waverley Leader on 23/3/2009
The Death of “Sweet Sixteen”

Whether we like it or not, casualisation of labour market has been around for quite awhile, and it is here to stay. The last hours of debate to kill off the Work Choices, introduced by the former Liberal Government, was bogged down by the definition of the size of employment capacity. Once again, Senator Steve Fielding, the trump card holder in the Upper House, allowed the bill to be passed after giving concession to Julie Gillard, the deputy prime minister, that for the first five years a small business is defined as one which employs 15 full-time equivalents(EFTs) and after which will amend to 15 individuals in total.

If the politicians care to talk to the store holders in shopping strips and shopping centres, particularly the hospitality business including take away outlets, they will realise that most of them would probably employ more than 15 casuals and part-time. Many current small business owners employ students as casual sales assistants, waiters and cleaners for a few hours of work per week, and are generally paid at under-award rates. Most students understand that they have been exploited and yet remained silent, for the fact that the little money they earn helps to subsidise their accommodation rental, daily expenses and education fees. Many business operators pay the casuals by cash-in-hand, and by doing so, they do not contribute adequately to Work Cover. In short, their annual income reported is not worth the paper it is written on.

Another industry that uses a lot of casual employees is the education sector especially in the TAFE colleges. Public TAFE colleges do employ more than 15 staff, but not many small private institutions or Recognised Training Organisations (RTO). Hundreds of competencies (or subjects) are available and being delivered (or taught) by skill-specific casual or sessional teachers. It is possible that 15 casual teachers are employed to deliver 15 competencies, each for 2 to 3 hours a week. Indeed, the total hours requires engaging the 15 teachers are less than 3 EFT’s.

Gillard’s definition for small business will force many more business owners not to record casual workers on their payroll, thus putting more workers at risk as they will be not covered by Work Cover. For the private RTOs, they will likely to sacrifice quality by employing sessional teachers who are able to deliver multiple competencies but of mediocre standard.

A fairer definition should place more emphasis on the earning capacity of the business rather than the number employed!

Thursday 5 March 2009

Students living in poverty

Posted to Waverley Leader on 5/3/2009 at 5:24 AM
Commenting on “Students living in poverty”

University or higher education is a privilege and not a right. Anyone who can make it should have planned carefully before enrolling and taking on the challenge. We cannot choose whatever societal system just to please our needs. We cannot expect everyone in the society to pick up the bills to educate us, or to clothe, feed or shelter us. Neither should we expect the society to raise our children! If this is what we expect or demand from the society, then we must go for a socialistic or communistic society, not a democratic and capitalistic one. Far too often, when graduates start to earn money, some may earn lots and lots of it, (they will) ill change their mind about supporting students living below the poverty line.

There is no rule to say at what age a student shall be attending university. The student should take responsibility of his/her destiny If one cannot make it by 19 years old then join the education train later, but works towards it with his/her strength and might. He/she may have to work 2 jobs or 3, 60 hours or 90, to save the necessary monies for university fees and expenses.

I had been a university student for many times, but never expected handout. I worked hard for it!